MAIS University of Michigan Administrative Information Services
[] SEARCH/BROWSE CONTACT US U-M HOME
SERVICES

System Access

Reports

Projects

Security

Consulting & Onsite Support

Help

Training

Groups & Communications

Upgrades

SYSTEMS

M-Pathways Systems

Document Imaging

Two-Factor Authentication / MToken

Development/Alumni Systems

eResearch

Wolverine Access

My LINC/MAIS LINC

System Information

About MAIS

MAIS Spirit of Excellence Award

MAIS Strategic Planning


MAIS Home Projects Sponsored Programs Implementation Team

Project Initiation Issues and Progress to Date

SPIT's current achievements toward improving project initiation resources that are available to help sponsored research administration staff perform their work are listed below. The links provide detailed information, which is further down on this page.

Issues

  • The process of "opening" a new project/grant is poorly understood and leads to erroneous expectations.
  • The distinctions between specialized service procurements and research collaborations are not consistently defined and understood.
  • Long lead times are associated with setting up sub-contracts which are exacerbated by uncertainty and inconsistency in the process.
  • The time required to prepare, negotiate, and sign research contracts can delay the start of work, discourage the negotiation of preferred terms, and strain relationships with contractors.
  • The inability of most research administrators to easily access DRDA databases of proposals and awards leads to the creation of redundant databases.
  • New project/grants may not be set up with the correct budget lines to accept appropriate and allowable charges.
  • Lack of knowledge about how to set up small business plans and lack of support in doing so has led to delays in setting up the project/grants that require them.
  • DRDA should have a uniform policy for distributing copies of signed PAFs, PANs, and PACs to project directors, administrative contacts, and authorized signers.
  • When project/grants are not assigned to the correct class, indirect costs may be charged inappropriately and activity is incorrectly recorded.

Progress to Date

Coming Soon to the U-M Research Community

  • Policy on Distribution of PAFs, PANs, and PACs
  • Complete Chartfield on PAN
  • PAN to give information on steps that can be taken before Chartfield active in the system

Progress to Date Details

Project Award Notice (PAN) Changes:
Based on feedback, a note has been added to the PAN near where the name of the assigned Financial Operations' coordinator name has always appeared. It states "the Principal Investigator (PI) is the only person who will receive any M-Pathways generated documents unless the Financial Operations (FinOps) Project/Grant (P/G) coordinator is contacted to change the recipient."

The PAN also now contains one of three possible notes, which give the recipients an idea of when the P/G and ShortCodes will be active in the system. For grants, it states "This PAN and award notice have been sent to Financial Operations for processing. If, after 10 days, the ChartField converter does not display all of the ChartField information for the ShortCode assigned to your P/G, contact your P/G coordinator." For contracts which become valid upon University of Michigan signature, the timeframe is 14 days. For contracts, which become valid when sponsors sign, the timeframe is 30 days.

Small Business Plan Flow Chart:
The lack of understanding about how to set up small business plans and the lack of support to get plans developed has led to delays in setting up Project/Grants (P/Gs) requiring them. Purchasing has created a flow chart and memo templates to facilitate the creation of small business plans for departments who must comply with federal regulation. Another important step taken by Purchasing has been to purchase access to Austin-Tetra, a database with 2.5 million diversity vendors that will help the research community to prospect diversity vendors. If you need to develop a small business plan, call Purchasing.

Pilot Purchasing Project:
The initial Task Team felt that both the support for complex or specialized purchase orders and the timeliness of purchase orders could be improved by a closer working relationship between Purchasing and research units. Unit administrators need to consider that Purchasing has to meet the University's legal and audit requirements. However, when unit staff is involved earlier in the process, they should be able to offer a higher level of assistance without impacting the efficiency of the procurement process. To explore this more closely, Purchasing has been conducting a pilot project with staff in the Space Physics Research Lab (SPRL), which is now in its third month. SPRL staff is taking on some responsibilities normally reserved for Purchasing staff, after going through training similar to that for a new purchasing agent. Based on findings from the Pilot Program, Purchasing is developing a Service Level Agreement (SLA). Purchasing plans to pursue and promote two-way communication that will lead to process improvements based on end-user feedback.

Project/Grant Establishment E-Mails:
There was concern related to the timeliness of opening Project/Grants (P/Gs) in the M-Pathways system. Faculty, research staff and administrators found it cumbersome to continually track whether the P/G and the ShortCode for a new research project had been successfully opened in the system. To ease the burden on administrators and other research staff, Sponsored Programs Financial Operations is now sending out e-mails to the P/G Single Administrative Point of Contacts (SAPOC) as well as the Project Director and contacts listed on the Project Approval Form (PAF) notifying them that their new P/G is active and ready to use in the M-Pathways system.